국제관계
국제규범 준수의 국내 선거구 메커니즘
Dai, Xinyuan. 2005. “Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism.” International Organization 59(2): 363–398. (Info & audience mechanisms; strategy for causal leverage.)
국제노동기구(ILO)-미얀마 협력 사례
Zhang, Yun and Yimeng Jia. 2021. "From Confrontation to Cooperation." Asian Survey 61(4):615-640.
유럽통합의 “변증법적 기능주의”
Corbey, Dorette. 1995. “Dialectical Functionalism: Stagnation as a Booster of European Integration.” International Organization 49(2):253-284.
국제정부기구(IGOs)의 관성과 변화
Shanks, Cheryl Harold K. Jacobson, Jeffrey H. Kaplan. 1996. “Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981-1992.” International Organization 50(4):593-627.
기능주의와 지역주의가 만들어낸 국제기구 내 균형
Haas, Ernst B. 1956. “Regionalism, Functionalism, and Universal International Organization.” World Politics 8(2):238-263.
국제인권협정(HRAs)과 무역협정(PTAs)의 영향력 비교
Hafner‑Burton, Emilie M. 2005. “Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression.” International Organization 59(3): 593–629.
국제관계이론으로 본 UNCHR의 선택과 처벌
Lebovic, James H., & Erik Voeten. 2006. “The Politics of Shame: The Condemnation of Country Human Rights Practices in the UN Commission on Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 50(4): 861–888.
양자투자조약과 외국인투자 그리고 ICSID의 역할
Allee, Todd, & Clint Peinhardt. 2011. “Contingent Credibility: The Impact of Investment Treaty Violations on Foreign Direct Investment.” International Organization 65(3): 401–432.
국제법의 준수 이유: 평판을 중심으로
Guzman, Andrew T. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. OUP, 2008. Ch. 3, “Reputation,” pp. 71–118.
올슨의 집단행동 이론과 현대적 함의
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, ch.1&2. (CP)
포클랜드 전쟁과 현실주의–신자유주의 논쟁
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. “Institutions and Cooperation: Sanctions during the Falkland Islands Conflict.” International Security 16(4):143-178.
공유지의 비극과 제도의 탄생
Garrett Hardin. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons”. Science 162(3859):1243-1248
제 3세계 채무위기와 국제금융질서
Lipson, Charles. 1981. “The International Organization of Third World Debt.” International Organization 35(4):603-631.
국제무역기구 탈출조항 (재)설계
Rosendorff, B. Peter, & Helen V. Milner. “The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape.” International Organization 55(4), 2001.
인권 조약의 비상시 권리 유보(derogation) 조항 분석
Hafner‑Burton, Emilie M., Laurence R. Helfer, & Christopher J. Fariss. “Emergency and Escape: Explaining Derogations from Human Rights Treaties.” International Organization 65(4), 2011.
Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) 설계 논의
Allee, Todd L., & Clint Peinhardt. “Evaluating Three Explanations for the Design of Bilateral Investment Treaties.” World Politics 66(1), 2014.
주권은 하나인가? 초법적 주권과 유기적 주권의 귀환
Paris, Roland. 2020. "The Right to Dominate: How Old Ideas About Sovereignty Pose New Challenges for World Order." International Organization 74(3):453-489.
근대 주권 개념에 대하여
박상섭. “근대 주권 개념의 발전과정.” 『세계정치』 25집 1호(2004)
공유 주권(Shared Sovereignty)과 실패국 거버넌스
Krasner, Stephen D. 2004. “Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States.” International Security 29(2):85-120.
주권 개념의 변동성에 대하여
Barkin, J. Samuel & Bruce Cronin. 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations.” International Organization 48(1):107-130.
국제정치에서 법이란 무엇인가?
Finnemore, Martha, & Stephen J. Toope. “Alternatives to ‘Legalization’: Richer Views of Law and Politics.” International Organization 55(3), 2001.
국제정치학과 국제법의 접점 - Legalization 논의
Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne‑Marie Slaughter, & Duncan Snidal. “The Concept of Legalization.” International Organization 54(3), 2000.
국제기구 연구와 자유주의 국제질서의 도전
Katzenstein, Keohane, Krasner (1998) “International Organization and the Study of World Politics” (IO 52:4)
국제 레짐 - 무정부 세계의 예외적 질서
Stein, Arthur A. “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World.” International Organization 36(2), 1982.
Mearsheimer와 제도주의자 간의 설전
Keohane, Robert O., & Lisa L. Martin. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security 20(1), 1995